diaryland
email
old n moldy
new n fresh
profile
aol im
dland notes

like original stories?
like to give feedback?
click here!

bored go here!

rings:
agnostic
altoids
ayn-rand
1976
complex
connecticut
corsets
curiosity
deviant
disillusiond
donnie darko
douglas adams
fark
farscape
gemini
individual
intj
introvert
ishmael
kinky-sex
libertarian
ourladypeace
pittsburgh
rum-lovers
virginia
writer

"Watch your thoughts; they become words. Watch your words; they become actions. Watch your actions; they become habits. Watch your habits; they become character. Watch your character; it becomes your destiny." -- unknown

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results - Albert Einstein


the EU and the US
May 29, 2005 - 5:16 pm

franced votes no on the EU constitution.. and until i read this article, i didn't care:

http://www.suntimes.com/output/steyn/cst-edt-steyn29.html

two quotes hightlight.. just how fucked up this EU thing as gotten:

1) "If at the end of the ratification process, we do not manage to solve the problems, the countries that would have said No, would have to ask themselves the question again," "President" Juncker told the Belgian newspaper Le Soir."

so.. those who vote no will keep voting until they vote yes? yikes.

"In a world that is wholly private," he says of America, "we lose our bearings; deprived of any public anchor, all we have are our individual subjective values to guide us." He deplores the First Amendment and misses government-regulated media, which in the EU ensures that all public expression is within approved parameters (left to center-left). "Europe," he explains, "acts to ensure that television and radio conform to public interest criteria."

now... given the choice between the media we have in the states.. and this idea of government controlled left/center left media.. i'll take the mess we have here. i rather like that i can, or anyone else, can talk shit about the government and not worry about retribution. i like the idea that i at least stand something of chance of hearing multiple sides of any given issue.. while the above only makes it certain one view will be given -- and that will be the view the government wants you to have.

now.. the article has lots of other interesting tidbits.. but those two stood out the most to me.

it seems the real question when comparing the EU to US is the idea of what should the government do or not do for its people. the EU is firmly left.. including a heck of alot more for everyone (housing and whatnot) along with tons of regulation. the US leans left, but it's still largely up to each of us to succeed or fail on our own.

so the question is, is it up to our government to provide for everyone or to just setup a frame work?

the ambious part of me says the US way is better.. the risk is higher, but those who win can reap the rewards. another part of me says, isn't it a good thing if everyone got to live at a decent preset level?

however, with the bottom set artifically higher, the top will have to be lower -- those who have ability won't be able to fly so high.

does this make sense? i'm not writing it in one thought.. but sort of haphazdly.

(this way) / (that way)

A place like Alaska - April 07, 2012
Dowton Abbey - February 01, 2011
Dowton Abbey - January 31, 2011
Something of an update - January 16, 2011
What to do... - January 01, 2011

Site Meter


cogito ergo doleo
my current wishlist item, yes i am waiting for godot.

we live in the land of the free, but are we brave enough to keep it that way?
you have a choice

my addiction: pokerstars